代写program编程设计、代做Python语言程序

日期：2021-03-31 11:40

Project 3: Ghostbusters

I can hear you, ghost.

Running won’t save you from my

Particle Filter!

Introduction

Pacman spends his life running from ghosts, but things were not always so. Legend has it that many years

ago, Pacman’s great grandfather Grandpac learned to hunt ghosts for sport. However, he was blinded by

his power and could only track ghosts by their banging and clanging.

In this project, you will design Pacman agents that use sensors to locate and eat invisible ghosts. You’ll

advance from locating sittng, stationary ghosts to hunting packs of multiple moving ghosts with ruthless

efficiency.

The code for this project contains the following files, available as a zip archive from the Canvas page.

Files you will edit:

busterAgents.py Agents for playing the Ghostbusters variant of Pacman.

inference.py Code for tracking ghosts over time using their sounds

Files you will not edit:

busters.py The main entry to Ghostbusters (replacing pacman.py)

bustersGhostAgents.py New ghost agents for Ghostbusters

distanceCalculator.py Computes maze distances

game.py Inner workings and helper classes for Pacman

ghostAgents.py Agents to control ghosts

graphicsDisplay.py Graphics for Pacman

graphicsUtils.py Support for Pacman graphics

keyboardAgents.py Keyboard interfaces to control Pacman

layout.py Code for reading layout files and storing their contents

util.py Utility functions

What to submit:

You will fill in portions of bustersAgents.py and inference.py during the assignment. You should submit

these files with your code and comments. Please do not change the other files in this distribution or submit

any other files.

Evaluation

Your code will be run through the autograder for technical correctness. Please do not change the names of

any provided functions or classes within the code, or you will wreak havoc on the autograder. However, the

correctness of your implementation – not the autograder’s judgments – will be the final judge of your score.

I will review and grade assignments individually to ensure that you receive due credit for your work.

Ghostbusters and BNs

In Ghostbusters, the goal is to hunt down scared but invisible ghosts. Pacman, ever resourceful, is equipped

with sonar (ears) that provides noisy readings of the Manhattan distance to each ghost. The game ends

when Pacman has eaten all the ghosts. To start, try playing a game yourself using the keyboard.

python busters.py

The blocks of color indicate where the each ghost could possibly be, given the noisy distance reading provided

to Pacman. The noisy distances at the bottom of the display are always non-negative, and always within 7

of the true distance. The probability of a distance reading decreases exponentially with its difference from

the true distance.

Your primary task in this project is to implement inference to track the ghosts. For the keyboard based

game above, a crude form of inference was implemented for you by default: all squares in which a ghost

could possibly be are shaded by the color of the ghost. Naturally, we want a better estimate of the ghosts’

positions. Fortunately, Bayes’ Nets provide us with powerful tools for making the most of the information

we have. Throughout the rest of this project, you will implement algorithms for performing both exact and

approximate inference using Bayes’ Nets. The lab is challenging, so we do encourage you to start early and

seek help when necessary.

While watching and debugging your code with the autograder, it will be helpful to have some understanding

of what the autograder is doing. There are two types of tests in this project, as differentiated by their *.test

files found in the subdirectories of the test_cases folder. For tests of class DoubleInferenceAgentTest,

you will see visualizations of the inference distributions generated by your code, but all Pacman actions

will be preselected according to the actions of the staff implementation. This is necessary in order to allow

comparison of your distributions with the staff’s distributions. The second type of test is GameScoreTest,

in which your BustersAgent will actually select actions for Pacman and you will watch your Pacman play

and win games.

As you implement and debug your code, you may find it useful to run a single test at a time. In order to do

this, you will need to use the -t flag with the autograder. For example if you only want to run the first test

of question 1, use:

python autograder.py -t test_cases/q1/1-ExactObserve

In general, all test cases can be found inside test_cases/q*

Question 1: Exact Inference Observation (6 points)

In this question, you will update the observe method in ExactInference class of inference.py to correctly

update the agent’s belief distribution over ghost positions given an observation from Pacman’s sensors. A

correct implementation should also handle one special case: when a ghost is eaten, you should place that

ghost in its prison cell, as described in the comments of observe.

To run the autograder for this question and visualize the output:

python autograder.py -q q1

As you watch the test cases, be sure that you understand how the squares converge to their final coloring.

In test cases where is Pacman boxed in (which is to say, he is unable to change his observation point), why

does Pacman sometimes have trouble finding the exact location of the ghost?

Note: Your busters agents have a separate inference module for each ghost they are tracking. That’s why

if you print an observation inside the observe function, you’ll only see a single number even though there

may be multiple ghosts on the board.

Hints:

? You are implementing the online belief update for observing new evidence. Before any readings, Pacman

believes the ghost could be anywhere: a uniform prior (see initializeUniformly). After receiving a

reading, the observe function is called, which must update the belief at every position.

? Before typing any code, write down the equation of the inference problem you are trying to solve.

? Try printing noisyDistance, emissionModel, and PacmanPosition (in the observe function) to get

started.

? In the Pacman display, high posterior beliefs are represented by bright colors, while low beliefs are

represented by dim colors. You should start with a large cloud of belief that shrinks over time as more

evidence accumulates.

? Beliefs are stored as util.Counter objects (like dictionaries) in a field called self.beliefs, which

you should update.

? You should not need to store any evidence. The only thing you need to store in ExactInference is

self.beliefs.

Question 2: Exact Inference with Time Elapse (4 points)

In the previous question you implemented belief updates for Pacman based on his observations. Fortunately,

Pacman’s observations are not his only source of knowledge about where a ghost may be. Pacman also has

knowledge about the ways that a ghost may move, namely that the ghost can not move through a wall or

more than one space in one timestep.

To understand why this is useful to Pacman, consider the following scenario in which there is Pacman and

one ghost. Pacman receives many observations which indicate the ghost is very near, but then one which

indicates the ghost is very far. The reading indicating the ghost is very far is likely to be the result of a

buggy sensor. Pacman’s prior knowledge of how the ghost may move will decrease the impact of this reading

since Pacman knows the ghost could not move so far in only one move.

In this question, you will implement the elapseTime method in ExactInference. Your agent has access to

the action distribution for any GhostAgent. In order to test your elapseTime implementation separately

from your observe implementation in the previous question, this question will not make use of your observe

implementation.

Since Pacman is not utilizing any observations about the ghost, this means that Pacman will start with

a uniform distribution over all spaces, and then update his beliefs according to how he knows the ghost

is able to move. Since Pacman is not observing the ghost, this means the ghost’s actions will not impact

Pacman’s beliefs. Over time, Pacman’s beliefs will come to reflect places on the board where he believes

ghosts are most likely to be given the geometry of the board and what Pacman already knows about their

valid movements.

For the tests in this question we will sometimes use a ghost with random movements and other times we will

use the GoSouthGhost. This ghost tends to move south over time, and without any observations, Pacman’s

belief distribution should begin to focus around the bottom of the board. To see which ghost is used for

each test case, you can look in the .test files.

To run the autograder for this question and visualize the output:

python autograder.py -q q2

As an example of the GoSouthGhostAgent, you can run

python autograder.py -t test_cases/q2/2-ExactElapse

and observe that the distribution becomes concentrated at the bottom of the board.

As you watch the autograder output, remember that lighter squares indicate that pacman believes a ghost is

more likely to occupy that location, and darker squares indicate a ghost is less likely to occupy that location.

For which of the test cases do you notice differences emerging in the shading of the squares? Can you explain

why some squares get lighter and some squares get darker?

Hints:

? Instructions for obtaining a distribution over where a ghost will go next, given its current position and

the gameState, appears in the comments of ExactInference.elapseTime in inference.py.

? We assume that ghosts still move independently of one another, so while you can develop all of your

code for one ghost at a time, adding multiple ghosts should still work correctly.

Question 3: Exact Inference Full Test (3 points)

Now that Pacman knows how to use both his prior knowledge and his observations when figuring out where

a ghost is, he is ready to hunt down ghosts on his own. This question will use your observe and elapseTime

implementations together, along with a simple greedy hunting strategy which you will implement for this

question. In the simple greedy strategy, Pacman assumes that each ghost is in its most likely position

according to its beliefs, then moves toward the closest ghost. Up to this point, Pacman has moved by

randomly selecting a valid action.

Implement the chooseAction method in GreedyBustersAgent in bustersAgents.py. Your agent should

first find the most likely position of each remaining (uncaptured) ghost, then choose an action that minimized

the distance to the closes ghost. If correctly implemented, your agent should win the game in

q3/3-gameScoreTest with a score greater than 700 at least 8 out of 10 times. Note: the autograder will

also check the correctness of your inference directly, but the outcome of games is a reasonable sanity check.

To run the autograder for this question and visualize the output:

python autograder.py -q q3

Note: If you want to run this test (or any of the other test) without graphics you can add the following flag:

python autograder.py -q q3 --no-graphics

Hints:

? When correctly implemented, your agent will thrash around a bit in order to capture a ghost.

? The comments of chooseAction provide you with useful method calls for computing maze distance

and successor positions.

? Make sure to only consider the living ghosts, as described in the comments.

Question 4: Approximate Inference Observation (4 points)

Approximate inference is very trendy among ghost hunters this season. Next, you will implement a particle

filtering algorithm for tracking a single ghost.

Implement the functions initializeUniformly, getBeliefDistribution, and observe for the ParticleFilter

class in inference.py. A correct implementation should also handle two special cases.

(1) When all your particles receive zero weight based on the evidence, you should resample all particles

from the prior to recover.

(2) When a ghost is eaten, you should update all particles to place that ghost in its prison cell, as described

in the comments of observe.

When complete, you should be able to track ghosts nearly as effectively as with exact inference.

To run the autograder for this question and visualize the output:

python autograder.py -q q4

Hints:

? A particle (sample) is a ghost position in this inference problem.

? The belief cloud generated by a particle filter will look noisy compared to the one for exact inference.

Question 5: Approximate Inference with Time Elapse (3 points)

Implement the elapseTime function for the ParticleFilter class in inference.py. When complete, you

should be able to track ghosts nearly as effectively as with exact inference.

Note that in this question, we will test both the elapseTime function in isolation, as well as the full

implementation of the particle filter combining elapseTime and observe.

To run the autograder for this question and visualize the output:

python autograder.py -q q5

For the tests in this question we will sometimes use a ghost with random movements and other times we will

use the GoSouthGhost. This ghost tends to move south over time, and without any observations, Pacman’s

belief distribution should begin to focus around the bottom of the board. To see which ghost is used for

each test case you can look in the .test files. As an example, you can run

python autograder.py -t test_cases/q5/2-ParticleElapse

and observe that the distribution becomes concentrated at the bottom of the board.

Extra Credit Question 6: Joint Particle Filter Observation (3 points)

So far, we have tracked each ghost independently, which works fine for the default RandomGhost or more advanced

DirectionalGhost. However, the prized DispersingGhost chooses actions that avoid other ghosts.

Since the ghosts’ transition models are no longer independent, all ghosts must be tracked jointly in a dynamic

Bayes’ net!

The Bayes’ net has the following structure, where the hidden variables G represent ghost positions and the

emission variables E are the noisy distances to each ghost. This structure can be extended to more ghosts,

but only two (a and b) are shown below.

You will now implement a particle filter that tracks multiple ghosts simultaneously. Each particle will

represent a tuple of ghost positions that is a sample of where all the ghosts are at the present time. The

code is already set up to extract marginal distributions about each ghost from the joint inference algorithm

you will create, so that belief clouds about individual ghosts can be displayed.

Complete the initializeParticles, getBeliefDistribution and observeState methods in JointParticleFilter

to weight and resample the whole list of particles based on new evidence. As before, a correct implementation

should also handle two special cases:

(1) When all your particles receive zero weight based on the evidence, you should resample all particles

from the prior to recover.

(2) When a ghost is eaten, you should update all particles to place that ghost in its prison cell, as described

in the comments of observeState.

You should now effectively track dispersing ghosts. To run the autograder for this question and visualize the

output:

python autograder.py -q q6

Extra Credit Question 7: Joint Particle Filter with Elapse Time (2 points)

Complete the elapseTime method in JointParticleFilter in inference.py to resample each particle

correctly for the Bayes’ net. In particular, each ghost should draw a new position conditioned on the

positions of all the ghosts at the previous time step. The comments in the method provide instructions for

support functions to help with sampling and creating the correct distribution.

Note that completing this question involves removing the call to util.raiseNotDefined(). This means

that the autograder will now grade both question 6 and question 7. Since these questions involve more

computational power (and time) to grade, please be patient!

As you run the autograder note that q7/1-JointParticleElapse and q7/2-JointParticleElapse test

your elapseTime implementations only, and pacman knows that the ghosts will move to the sides of the

gameboard. What is different between the tests, and why?

To run the autograder for this question, use:

python autograder.py -q q7