联系方式

  • QQ:99515681
  • 邮箱:99515681@qq.com
  • 工作时间:8:00-23:00
  • 微信:codinghelp

您当前位置:首页 >> Java编程Java编程

日期:2024-06-15 10:02

COMP9414 24T2

Artificial Intelligence

Assignment 1 - Artificial neural networks

Due: Week 5, Wednesday, 26 June 2024, 11:55 PM.

1 Problem context

Time Series Air Quality Prediction with Neural Networks: In this

assignment, you will delve into the realm of time series prediction using neural

network architectures. You will explore both classification and estimation

tasks using a publicly available dataset.

You will be provided with a dataset named “Air Quality,” [1] available

on the UCI Machine Learning Repository 1. We tailored this dataset for this

assignment and made some modifications. Therefore, please only use the

attached dataset for this assignment.

The given dataset contains 8,358 instances of hourly averaged responses

from an array of five metal oxide chemical sensors embedded in an air qual-

ity chemical multisensor device. The device was located in the field in a

significantly polluted area at road level within an Italian city. Data were

recorded from March 2004 to February 2005 (one year), representing the

longest freely available recordings of on-field deployed air quality chemical

sensor device responses. Ground truth hourly averaged concentrations for

carbon monoxide, non-methane hydrocarbons, benzene, total nitrogen ox-

ides, and nitrogen dioxide among other variables were provided by a co-

located reference-certified analyser. The variables included in the dataset

1https://archive.ics.uci.edu/dataset/360/air+quality

1

are listed in Table 1. Missing values within the dataset are tagged

with -200 value.

Table 1: Variables within the dataset.

Variable Meaning

CO(GT) True hourly averaged concentration of carbon monoxide

PT08.S1(CO) Hourly averaged sensor response

NMHC(GT) True hourly averaged overall Non Metanic HydroCar-

bons concentration

C6H6(GT) True hourly averaged Benzene concentration

PT08.S2(NMHC) Hourly averaged sensor response

NOx(GT) True hourly averaged NOx concentration

PT08.S3(NOx) Hourly averaged sensor response

NO2(GT) True hourly averaged NO2 concentration

PT08.S4(NO2) Hourly averaged sensor response

PT08.S5(O3) Hourly averaged sensor response

T Temperature

RH Relative Humidity

AH Absolute Humidity

2 Activities

This assignment focuses on two main objectives:

? Classification Task: You should develop a neural network that can

predict whether the concentration of Carbon Monoxide (CO) exceeds

a certain threshold – the mean of CO(GT) values – based on historical

air quality data. This task involves binary classification, where your

model learns to classify instances into two categories: above or below

the threshold. To determine the threshold, you must first calculate

the mean value for CO(GT), excluding unknown data (missing values).

Then, use this threshold to predict whether the value predicted by your

network is above or below it. You are free to choose and design your

own network, and there are no limitations on its structure. However,

your network should be capable of handling missing values.

2

? Regression Task: You should develop a neural network that can pre-

dict the concentration of Nitrogen Oxides (NOx) based on other air

quality features. This task involves estimating a continuous numeri-

cal value (NOx concentration) from the input features using regression

techniques. You are free to choose and design your own network and

there is no limitation on that, however, your model should be able to

deal with missing values.

In summary, the classification task aims to divide instances into two cat-

egories (exceeding or not exceeding CO(GT) threshold), while the regression

task aims to predict a continuous numerical value (NOx concentration).

2.1 Data preprocessing

It is expected you analyse the provided data and perform any required pre-

processing. Some of the tasks during preprocessing might include the ones

shown below; however, not all of them are necessary and you should evaluate

each of them against the results obtained.

(a) Identify variation range for input and output variables.

(b) Plot each variable to observe the overall behaviour of the process.

(c) In case outliers or missing data are detected correct the data accord-

ingly.

(d) Split the data for training and testing.

2.2 Design of the neural network

You should select and design neural architectures for addressing both the

classification and regression problem described above. In each case, consider

the following steps:

(a) Design the network and decide the number of layers, units, and their

respective activation functions.

(b) Remember it’s recommended your network accomplish the maximal

number of parameters Nw < (number of samples)/10.

(c) Create the neural network using Keras and TensorFlow.

3

2.3 Training

In this section, you have to train your proposed neural network. Consider

the following steps:

(a) Decide the training parameters such as loss function, optimizer, batch

size, learning rate, and episodes.

(b) Train the neural model and verify the loss values during the process.

(c) Verify possible overfitting problems.

2.4 Validating the neural model

Assess your results plotting training results and the network response for the

test inputs against the test targets. Compute error indexes to complement

the visual analysis.

(a) For the classification task, draw two different plots to illustrate your

results over different epochs. In the first plot, show the training and

validation loss over the epochs. In the second plot, show the training

and validation accuracy over the epochs. For example, Figure 1 and

Figure 2 show loss and classification accuracy plots for 100 epochs,

respectively.

Figure 1: Loss plot for the classifica-

tion task

Figure 2: Accuracy plot for the clas-

sification task

4

(b) For the classification task, compute a confusion matrix 2 including True

Positive (TP), True Negative (TN), False Positive (FP), and False Neg-

ative (FN), as shown in Table 2. Moreover, report accuracy and pre-

cision for your test data and mention the number of tested samples as

shown in Table 3 (the numbers shown in both tables are randomly cho-

sen and may not be consistent with each other). For instance, Sklearn

library offers a various range of metric functions 3, including confusion

matrix 4, accuracy, and precision. You can use Sklearn in-built met-

ric functions to calculate the mentioned metrics or develop your own

functions.

Table 2: Confusion matrix for the test data for the classification task.

Confusion Matrix Positive (Actual) Negative (Actual)

Positive (Predicted) 103 6

Negative (Predicted) 6 75

Table 3: Accuracy and precision for the test data for the classification task.

Accuracy Precision Number of Samples

CO(GT) classification 63% 60% 190

(c) For the regression task, draw two different plots to illustrate your re-

sults. In the first plot, show how the selected loss function varies for

both the training and validation through the epochs. In the second

plot, show the final estimation results for the validation test. For in-

stance, Figure 3 and Figure 4 show the loss function and the network

outputs vs the actual NOx(GT) values for a validation test, respec-

tively. In Figure 4 no data preprocessing has been performed, however,

as mentioned above, it is expected you include this in your assignment.

(d) For the regression task, report performance indexes including the Root

Mean Squared Error (RMSE), Mean Absolute Error (MAE) (see a

discussion on [2]), and the number of samples for your estimation of

2https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confusion matrix

3https://scikit-learn.org/stable/api/sklearn.metrics.html

4https://scikitlearn.org/stable/modules/generated/sklearn.metrics.confusion matrix.html

5

Figure 3: Loss plot for the re-

gression task.

Figure 4: Estimated and actual NOx(GT)

for the validation set.

NOx(GT) values in a table. Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) mea-

sures the differences between the observed values and predicted ones

and is defined as follows:

RMSE =

1

n

Σi=ni=1 (Yi ? Y?i)2, (1)

where n is the number of our samples, Yi is the actual label and Y?i

is the predicted value. In the same way, MAE can be defined as the

absolute average of errors as follows:

MAE =

1

n

Σi=ni=1 |Yi ? Y?i|. (2)

Table 4 shows an example of the performance indexes (all numbers are

randomly chosen and may not be consistent with each other). As men-

tioned before, Sklearn library offers a various range of metric functions,

including RMSE5 and MAE 6. You can use Sklearn in-built metric func-

tions to calculate the mentioned metrics or develop your own functions.

Table 4: Result table for the test data for the regression task.

RMSE MAE Number of Samples

90.60 50.35 55

5https://scikit-learn.org/stable/modules/generated/sklearn.metrics.root mean squared error.html

6https://scikit-learn.org/stable/modules/generated/sklearn.metrics.mean absolute error.html

6

3 Testing and discussing your code

As part of the assignment evaluation, your code will be tested by tutors along

with you in a discussion session carried out in the tutorial session in week 6.

The assignment has a total of 25 marks. The discussion is mandatory and,

therefore, we will not mark any assignment not discussed with tutors.

You are expected to propose and build neural models for classification

and regression tasks. The minimal output we expect to see are the results

mentioned above in Section 2.4. You will receive marks for each of these

subsection as shown in Table 5, i.e. 7 marks in total. However, it’s fine if

you want to include any other outcome to highlight particular aspects when

testing and discussing your code with your tutor.

For marking your results, you should be prepared to simulate your neural

model with a generalisation set we have saved apart for that purpose. You

must anticipate this by including in your submission a script ready to open

a file (with the same characteristics as the given dataset but with fewer data

points), simulate the network, and perform all the validation tests described

in Section 2.4 (b) and (d) (accuracy, precision, RMSE, MAE). It is recom-

mended to save all of your hyper-parameters and weights (your model in

general) so you can call your network and perform the analysis later in your

discussion session.

As for the classification task, you need to compute accuracy and precision,

while for the regression task RMSE and MAE using the generalisation set.

You will receive 3 marks for each task, given successful results. Expected

results should be as follows:

? For the classification task, your network should achieve at least 85%

accuracy and precision. Accuracy and precision lower than that will

result in a score of 0 marks for that specific section.

? For the regression task, it is expected to achieve an RMSE of at least

280 and an MAE of 220 for unseen data points. Errors higher than the

mentioned values will be marked as 0 marks.

Finally, you will receive 1 mark for code readability for each task, and

your tutor will also give you a maximum of 5 marks for each task depending

on the level of code understanding as follows: 5. Outstanding, 4. Great,

3. Fair, 2. Low, 1. Deficient, 0. No answer.

7

Table 5: Marks for each task.

Task Marks

Results obtained with given dataset

Loss and accuracy plots for classification task 2 marks

Confusion matrix and accuracy and precision tables for classifi-

cation task

2 marks

Loss and estimated NOx(GT) plots for regression task 2 marks

Performance indexes table for regression task 1 mark

Results obtained with generalisation dataset

Accuracy and precision for classification task 3 marks

RMSE and MAE for regression task 3 marks

Code understanding and discussion

Code readability for classification task 1 mark

Code readability for regression task 1 mark

Code understanding and discussion for classification task 5 mark

Code understanding and discussion for regression task 5 mark

Total marks 25 marks

4 Submitting your assignment

The assignment must be done individually. You must submit your assignment

solution by Moodle. This will consist of a single .ipynb Jupyter file. This file

should contain all the necessary code for reading files, data preprocessing,

network architecture, and result evaluations. Additionally, your file should

include short text descriptions to help markers better understand your code.

Please be mindful that providing clean and easy-to-read code is a part of

your assignment.

Please indicate your full name and your zID at the top of the file as a

comment. You can submit as many times as you like before the deadline –

later submissions overwrite earlier ones. After submitting your file a good

practice is to take a screenshot of it for future reference.

Late submission penalty: UNSW has a standard late submission

penalty of 5% per day from your mark, capped at five days from the as-

sessment deadline, after that students cannot submit the assignment.

8

5 Deadline and questions

Deadline: Week 5, Wednesday 26 June of June 2024, 11:55pm. Please

use the forum on Moodle to ask questions related to the project. We will

prioritise questions asked in the forum. However, you should not share your

code to avoid making it public and possible plagiarism. If that’s the case,

use the course email cs9414@cse.unsw.edu.au as alternative.

Although we try to answer questions as quickly as possible, we might take

up to 1 or 2 business days to reply, therefore, last-moment questions might

not be answered timely.

6 Plagiarism policy

Your program must be entirely your own work. Plagiarism detection software

might be used to compare submissions pairwise (including submissions for

any similar projects from previous years) and serious penalties will be applied,

particularly in the case of repeat offences.

Do not copy from others. Do not allow anyone to see your code.

Please refer to the UNSW Policy on Academic Honesty and Plagiarism if you

require further clarification on this matter.

References

[1] De Vito, S., Massera, E., Piga, M., Martinotto, L. and Di Francia, G.,

2008. On field calibration of an electronic nose for benzene estimation in an

urban pollution monitoring scenario. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical,

129(2), pp.750-757.

[2] Hodson, T. O. 2022. Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute

error (MAE): When to use them or not. Geoscientific Model Development

Discussions, 2022, 1-10.


版权所有:留学生编程辅导网 2020 All Rights Reserved 联系方式:QQ:99515681 微信:codinghelp 电子信箱:99515681@qq.com
免责声明:本站部分内容从网络整理而来,只供参考!如有版权问题可联系本站删除。 站长地图

python代写
微信客服:codinghelp