代写GGR209 WA2代写数据结构程序

日期：2025-11-01 11:23

Introduction (½ – 1 page)

· Define “automation,” “AI,” and “the end of work.”

· Explain why this issue matters to Canada and global labour markets.

· Introduce the debate:

o Optimists → technology creates new jobs, raises efficiency.

o Pessimists → machines replace human labour, exacerbate inequality.

· State goal: to objectively present both sides and policy implications for lawmakers.

---

Background and Context (1 page)

· Trace technological change from industrial revolution to AI era.

· Summarize evidence from readings:

o UN (2017): most automation is task-specific, not full job replacement

o Johal (U of T Mowat Centre): focus on social policy and training needs

o OECD / McKinsey data on rising inequality and polarization

· Clarify that “automation vs jobs” is not new but accelerated by digitalization.

---

Arguments Supporting(1 page)

· Rising automation risk: routine jobs (mfg., retail, transport) most affected.

· Economic polarization: high-skill jobs grow; middle declines 【GGR209 Class 3 L18-L19】.

· Social inequality: wage stagnation and job insecurity.

· Technological speed: AI advances faster than policy adaptation.

· Brief examples (e.g., self-driving trucks, automated cashiers).

---

Arguments Against (1 page)

· Job creation effect: tech generates new industries and roles (AI maintenance, data analysis) 【GGR209 Class 3 L14-L15】.

· Task redistribution: humans handle creative / relational aspects while machines do repetitive tasks 【GGR209 Class 3 L16-L17】.

· Historical pattern: previous waves (agricultural, industrial) also caused temporary displacement but eventual growth.

· Limits to automation: cost, regulation, and social acceptance slow adoption.

---

Policy Responses and Future Outlook (1 – 1.5 pages)

· Education & Retraining: align skills with emerging industries.

· Social protection: enhance employment insurance, minimum wage, UBI debate 【GGR209 Class 3 L18-L19】.

· Corporate responsibility: ethical AI and workforce transition plans.

· International dimension: global North-South inequality and technology access gap.

· Present both supporting and opposing opinions objectively (using bullet points if needed).

---

Conclusion (½ page)

---