代写SIT283程序、代做c/c++，Python编程设计、CS，Java程序代写

日期：2021-05-08 10:23

SIT283: Development for Virtual Reality

Assessment 2

VR Development Challenge

Note that you do not need to complete previous assessment tasks before starting work on this challenge. You

should start planning your solution from now on, firming up your ideas and integrating components as we

cover key concepts in each week of the unit. This will maximize your opportunities to get suggestions and

feedback from the teaching staff prior to submission.

This challenge is an opportunity to integrate the various skills learned throughout the unit. You will develop

a virtual reality experience based around one of the concept areas that will be provided to use. Your solution

must incorporate the elements listed below in this document in order to meet all of the criteria for

assessment. Your report should provide a clear description of the contributions you have made in your

development. Well written and commented code must also be easily accessible within your project file using

professional naming conventions.

This is a significant element that should be incorporated into your professional portfolio. The material may

also be demonstrated and shared with your peers and industry representatives at showcase sessions at the

end of trimester.

Submission Details

Due Date

End of week 10 (11:59PM, 21st May 2021).

Format of submission

Each submission should contain:

? A document formatted according to the template provided below.

? The project file (a zip archive containing all of the resources, scripts and other assets required to

build, deploy and test your solution).

? Any further material specified explicitly in the task description.

Submission method

Submit materials to the appropriate unit site assignment folder in CloudDeakin.

Working arrangements

Individual submissions. Discussions with peers and teaching are encouraged but solutions must be

individually developed. Solutions should acknowledge all sources of assistance, and formally cite and

reference any external materials used.

Task description

Select one of the concepts provided in the concept document and build a virtual reality application

corresponding to one of the contexts listed. Alternative contexts for one of the concepts listed can be

undertaken with approval of the unit chair.

Due to the ongoing crisis with COVID-19, a number of students are joining the unit online and cannot utilize

the head mounted display and associated controllers. In those cases, your application must be able to run in a

simulator or as a Unity application. The tutors will help you in achieving that. Please discuss with the tutors

during the lab times or schedule a meeting online if required.

Your solution needs to incorporate a minimum set of functionalities as per the list below in order to

demonstrate achievement of the learning outcomes for this unit. Skills developed in the other VR and AR

units can be incorporated to further improve the quality of the resulting product and increase the likelihood

that your skills will be valued by our external partners and stakeholders. We would like the resulting

application to be one that you would proudly include on your portfolio.

Discuss your plans with the teaching staff, particularly if you need any clarification on whether a feature you

have planned meets the required level of functionality. You should discuss and finalize this with the unit

chair by week 4 so that formative feedback can be provided.

This task is intended to allow you to practice your development skills in creating VR applications. You

would need to enhance existing third-party components or built-in facilities to provide additional

functionality if you wish to claim those elements towards satisfying requirements. You may freely use

(subject to valid licensing and acknowledging sources) such components or third-party art assets, to support

your applications in ways that you do not designate for assessment purposes. All material that you do not

create yourself (including third party scripts, built-in scripts, material developed from tutorials,

answers from support sites, help received from any source including teachers) must be clearly

identified and referenced.

Requiredfunctionality:

Your virtual reality application must include each of the following elements.

1. Scripts that provide various form of control:

a. Some form of movement involving change of position of one or more objects (which can

include the viewer). Simple forms of this include movement along one of the principle

axes. More sophisticated movement would follow a curve, or respond dynamically to

other factors (e.g. cross winds and wind resistance)

b. Some form of direction (attitude) control allowing objects to be rotated. Simple forms of

this include rotations around a single axis. More sophisticated use involves rotation to

track a particular object or person.

2. The application should support a task that involves a sequence of steps that have to be undertaken

by the users. The goal of this requirement is to demonstrate management of state and transitions

between different states; specifically, the application of the state machine pattern.

3. The application should support a tool that allows the user to interact with the environment in some

way. An appropriate representation is needed for the tool, and to shows its effects. Control of the

tool will involve managing input from an appropriate controller. An example would be a magic

wand for teleporting to a particular location but would ideally be a mechanism unique to the

context for which the application is developed.

4. Visual, auditory and other sensory cues need to be provided to increase the value of using a

virtual reality solution towards solving these tasks. This requirement evaluates the mechanisms

required to use such media resources. Given the use of simulators only, we would encourage to

find innovative ways to achieve this (for example, keyboard or mouse-based controls to trigger

some cue).

5. Key parameters of the application must be assessable via a user interface provided to the user

while in the virtual environment. There needs to be at least one parameter (such as difficulty level,

or speed of interaction) that the user can manipulate, and which will have an effect on some

clearly identifiable property of the virtual world.

6. Some part of the virtual environment needs to include an autonomous simulation. This may be

moving blood cells through a circulatory system in a medical simulation or having a bath filling

with water while showing off real estate. This simulation need not be affected by user behavior,

but interaction can be included to achieve a high-quality solution.

7. The application needs to include a start screen, with title and author details, a brief overview of

the purpose and the controls or controller configuration to be used. The application must have an

option to exit back to this start screen and reset the experience.

Reporttemplate:

Prepare a report describing your solution to the task, particularly with respect to the VR/AR development

aspects of the process. Your report should contain the following sections, corresponding to the assessment

criteria in the rubric:

1. Introduction

a) Name of the concept that you have chosen.

b) Describe the context of that concept that you have chosen.

c) List the key requirements of the concept and briefly describe how you have achieved these

requirements in the virtual reality experience you have created.

d) Justify why your application should be considered to be a virtual reality experience.

2. Required functionality:

Include a numbered and labelled subsection for each of the key challenges required. In each

subsection:

a. Explain what you intend or have done to satisfy that particular requirement (1 paragraph).

b. Describe research conducted into ways of solving the challenge. References are important.

Finding specific code fragments represents very limited research ability.

c. Finding and reporting programming patterns or adapting and applying abstract concepts to

produce professional quality results represents valuable research.

d. Present your design and solution. Describe your choice of patterns to solve the problem.

Show the relevant portion of well written and commented code. Support each excerpt with

brief discussion of the significance of this script fragment as to why it represents a

valuable demonstration of your programming abilities.

e. Show how well this functionality works. Provide screenshots clearly showing the effect.

Mention any testing conducted to make sure the functionality is robust.

3. Operational instructions.

a) Describe how to install and run your code. You may assume that the software and equipment

available in the laboratory will be used for testing, but be specific on any software version

requirements, or particular configuration of any hardware that needs to be connected. Make sure

your solution runs correctly when loaded (defaults to the correct scene, for example).

b) Give instructions on how to test each of the facilities required. This includes any sequence of keys,

gestures or controller operations required to invoke them.

Marking Rubric

Criteria ULO GLO Inadequate 0

points

Minimal

1 point

Adequate 3

points

Good

4 points

Excellent

5 points

Challenges

identified and

solutions

proposed.

2 4,5

No submission, no

requirements/challenges identified, or

no algorithm/data structures

presented as a design pattern.

Information

related to these

criteria scattered

throughout

document or has

to be inferred

from material

presented. Not

clear how

solution

qualifies as a

virtual reality

application.

Concept

described and

the required

elements are

identified and

discussed in a

clearly

identified

section.

Solutions are

achieved by

adapting the

challenge to

reuse existing

VR solutions

directly with

limited

modification or

innovation.

Thecontextis

interpreted

through an

explicitdesign

identifying key

features and

challenges.

Insights based

on unitcontent

and external

research are

correctly

interpreted and

adaptedto these

challenges.

Evidence of

ability to

design

solutions

incorporating

an

understanding

of development

for a VR

environment.

Most of the

significant

challenges in

developing the

solution are

explicitly

identified.

Plausible

strategies for

addressing

these using

techniques

coveredinthe

unit are

described.

Research into

solutions to

support VR/AR

component

development

2 3

No submission, mechanical

reporting of externally sourced

material,materialprovidedoutof

context. Reporting issues

encountered with no attempt to

resolve.

Issues are

explicitly

identified but

no strategies

arereportedto

deal with them.

Material taken

from external

resources, or

unitcontent,is

applied in an

inappropriate

or ineffective

manner.

Problems

encountered are

discussed in

relation to

similar

problems

encountered by

others.Itis

clear that

appropriate

information has

been found,

even if this has

not been

applied tothe

solution.

External

material, such

as web sources,

discussions, or

books, is

evaluated, and

referenced

appropriately.

Insights from

these sources

show evidence

of interpretation

and adaptation

to the problem

context. The

research has

contributed to

achieving

project

outcomes.

Evidence of

identifying

reputable

sources of

information

and correctly

extracting

relevant

points.

Processes

adaptedtothe

problem

context.

Sources can

include online

support sites.

Solutions

should be

rephrased in

terms of the

student's own

solution and

should avoid

using outdated

or incorrect

information.

Explicit

evaluation of

alternative

strategies

2, 3 1,4,5

No submission. Invalid or

inconsistentargumentspresented. No

evidence that the student

understandsthe approachused,its

limitationsorhowthisimpacton the

resultingexperience.

Some implicit

consideration

could be

inferred from

the description

provided.

Limited

evidence of

critical

thinking.

Pros and cons

of alternative

approaches are

mentioned

when

presenting the

description of

the process.

Decisions are

made and

applied.

Pros and cons

are explicitly

mentioned, and

choice of

strategy is

justified.

Solution

provided

shows use of

theseideas,by

adapting them

totheneedsof

the

development

project (i.e.

integrated or

modified).

Critical

thinking and

problem

solving

demonstrated

through

reasoned

consideration of

alternatives.

Quality of

implementation:

Control of

movement

1,2,3 1

No submission, non-functional

solution or implementation does not

correspond with reported design.

Material taken directly from external

source with no original contribution

by the student.

Reuse of

existing

materials

(external with

referencing, or

internal unit

materials) with

minor cosmetic

enhancements

that are clearly

labelled.

Relevant code

fragments,

authored by the

student, are

presented that

are described in

an accurate

fashion, and

that

demonstrate

coding practices

showing that

the student is

Software adapts

existing

solutions to the

problem

context or

develops new

solutions

through

relevant

algorithmic

reasoning.

Software

presented is the

student's own

work with

Effective

solution

implemented,

using clean

and well

documented

code, which

efficientlyuses

the available

facilities.

Evidence of

applicationof

concepts

coveredinthe

unit, and

able to reuse

and adapt

solutions

achieved from

elsewhere. Any

material

presented from

other sources is

clearly

identified and is

adapted to the

problem

context. Good

naming and

commenting

practice are

followed.

third party

material

constituting

only small

portions of the

complete

system, and this

contribution

clearly marked

and justified.

Good software

development

practices,

including code

presentation,

and component

integration.

adapting these

techniques to

the problem

context.

1,2,3 1

No submission, non-functional

solution or implementation does not

correspond with reported design.

Material taken directly from external

source with no original contribution

by the student

Reuse of

existing

materials

(external with

referencing, or

internal unit

materials) with

minor cosmetic

enhancements

that are clearly

labelled.

Relevant code

fragments,

authored by the

student, are

presented that

are described in

an accurate

fashion, and

that

demonstrate

coding

practices

showing that

the student is

able to reuse

and adapt

solutions

achieved from

elsewhere. Any

material

presented from

other sources is

clearly

identified and is

adapted to the

problem

context. Good

naming and

commenting

practice are

followed.

Software adapts

existing

solutions to the

problem

context or

develops new

solutions

through

relevant

algorithmic

reasoning.

Software

presented is the

student's own

work with third

party material

constituting

only small

portions of the

complete

system, and this

contribution

clearly marked

and justified.

Good software

development

practices,

including code

presentation,

and component

integration.

Effective

solution

implemented,

using clean and

well

documented

code, which

efficiently uses

the available

facilities.

Evidence of

application of

concepts

covered in the

unit and

adapting these

techniques to

the problem

context.

Quality of

implementation:

sequence of

states

Quality of

implementation:

tool use

1,2,3 1

No submission, non-functional

solution or implementation does not

correspond with reported design.

Material taken directly from external

source with no original contribution

by the student

Reuse of

existing

materials

(external with

referencing, or

internal unit

materials) with

minor cosmetic

enhancements

that are clearly

labelled.

Relevant code

fragments,

authored by the

student, are

presented that

are described in

an accurate

fashion, and

that

demonstrate

coding

practices

showing that

the student is

able to reuse

and adapt

solutions

achieved from

elsewhere. Any

material

presented from

other sources is

clearly

identified and is

adapted to the

problem

context. Good

naming and

commenting

practice are

followed.

Software adapts

existing

solutions to the

problem

context or

develops new

solutions

through

relevant

algorithmic

reasoning.

Software

presented is the

student's own

work with third

party material

constituting

only small

portions of the

complete

system, and this

contribution

clearly marked

and justified.

Good software

development

practices,

including code

presentation,

and component

integration.

Effective

solution

implemented,

using clean and

well

documented

code, which

efficiently uses

the available

facilities.

Evidence of

application of

concepts

covered in the

unit and

adapting these

techniques to

the problem

context.

Quality of

implementation:

media resources

1,2,3 1

No submission, non-functional

solution or implementation does not

correspond with reported design.

Material taken directly from external

source with no original contribution

by the student

Reuse of

existing

materials

(external with

referencing, or

internal unit

materials) with

minor cosmetic

enhancements

that are clearly

labelled.

Relevant code

fragments,

authored by the

student, are

presented that

are described in

an accurate

fashion, and

that

demonstrate

coding

practices

showing that

the student is

able to reuse

and adapt

solutions

achieved from

elsewhere. Any

material

presented from

other sources is

clearly

Software adapts

existing

solutions to the

problem

context or

develops new

solutions

through

relevant

algorithmic

reasoning.

Software

presented is the

student's own

work with third

party material

constituting

only small

portions of the

complete

system, and this

contribution

Effective

solution

implemented,

using clean and

well

documented

code, which

efficiently uses

the available

facilities.

Evidence of

application of

concepts

covered in the

unit and

adapting these

techniques to

the problem

context.

identified, and

is adapted to

the problem

context. Good

naming and

commenting

practice are

followed.

clearly marked

and justified.

Good software

development

practices,

including code

presentation,

and component

integration.

1,2,3 1

No submission, non-functional

solution or implementation does not

correspond with reported design.

Material taken directly from external

source with no original contribution

by the student

Reuse of

existing

materials

(external with

referencing, or

internal unit

materials) with

minor cosmetic

enhancements

that are clearly

labelled.

Relevant code

fragments,

authored by the

student, are

presented that

are described in

an accurate

fashion, and

that

demonstrate

coding

practices

showing that

the student is

able to reuse

and adapt

solutions

achieved from

elsewhere. Any

material

presented from

other sources is

clearly

identified and is

adapted to the

problem

context. Good

naming and

commenting

practice are

followed.

Software adapts

existing

solutions to the

problem

context or

develops new

solutions

through

relevant

algorithmic

reasoning.

Software

presented is the

student's own

work with third

party material

constituting

only small

portions of the

complete

system, and this

contribution

clearly marked

and justified.

Good software

development

practices,

including code

presentation,

and component

integration.

Effective

solution

implemented,

using clean and

well

documented

code, which

efficiently uses

the available

facilities.

Evidence of

application of

concepts

covered in the

unit and

adapting these

techniques to

the problem

context.

Quality of

implementation:

user interface

setting

parameter with

effect on VR

experience

1,2,3 1

No submission, non-functional

solution or implementation does not

correspond with reported design.

Material taken directly from external

source with no original contribution

by the student

Reuse of

existing

materials

(external with

referencing, or

internal unit

materials) with

minor cosmetic

enhancements

that are clearly

labelled.

Relevant code

fragments,

authored by the

student, are

presented that

are described in

an accurate

fashion, and

that

demonstrate

coding

practices

Software adapts

existing

solutions to the

problem

context or

develops new

solutions

through

relevant

algorithmic

reasoning.

Software

presented is

Effective

solution

implemented,

using clean

and well

documented

code, which

efficientlyuses

the available

facilities.

Evidence of

application of

concepts

Quality of

implementation:

autonomous

simulation

showing that

the student is

able to reuse

and adapt

solutions

achieved from

elsewhere. Any

material

presented from

other sources is

clearly

identified and is

adapted to the

problem

context. Good

naming and

commenting

practice are

followed.

the student's

own work with

third party

material

constituting

only small

portions of the

complete

system, and this

contribution

clearly marked

and justified.

Good software

development

practices,

including code

presentation,

and component

integration.

covered in the

unit and

adapting these

techniques to

the problem

context.

1,2,3 1

No submission, non-functional

solution or implementation does not

correspond with reported design.

Material taken directly from external

source with no original contribution

by the student

Reuse of

existing

materials

(external with

referencing, or

internal unit

materials) with

minor cosmetic

enhancements

that are clearly

labelled.

Relevant code

fragments,

authored by the

student, are

presented that

are described in

an accurate

fashion, and

that

demonstrate

coding

practices

showing that

the student is

able to reuse

and adapt

solutions

achieved from

elsewhere. Any

material

presented from

other sources is

clearly

identified and is

adapted to the

problem

context. Good

naming and

commenting

practice are

followed.

Software adapts

existing

solutions to the

problem

context or

develops new

solutions

through

relevant

algorithmic

reasoning.

Software

presented is the

student's own

work with third

party material

constituting

only small

portions of the

complete

system, and this

contribution

clearly marked

and justified.

Good software

development

practices,

including code

presentation,

and component

integration.

Effective

solution

implemented,

using clean and

well

documented

code, which

efficiently uses

the available

facilities.

Evidence of

application of

concepts

covered in the

unit and

adapting these

techniques to

the problem

context.

Quality of

implementation:

start screen

with

instructions

Quality of

evaluation

1,2 1,4,5

No submission, no attempt to validate

solution reported.

Only

screenshots of

final VR

experience.

Doesnotjustify

product as a

virtual reality

system.

Several test

cases are

shown,

corresponding to

the individual

features of the

project.

Results

achieved are

interpreted to

ensure that

they are

showing

correct

functioning of

the

application.

Individual

components are

tested, and these

tests are

presented.

Tests also

consider

integration of

components.

Evidence of

user testing.

Requirements

of problem task

are

systematically

validated. The

application is

shown to work,

meet its goals,

and to provide

a usable

experience.